quiddity wrote:
What to do about someone who has "lost the
plot"?
For example, this editor seems to be going from article to article,
deleting every prose paragraph that doesn't have a ref tag (usually
everything except the intro sentence).
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&offset=…
Some of the content being removed is obviously not good (selfpromoting
peacockery etc), but much is perfectly fine, and this seems to be one
of the worst (most indiscriminate) ways to handle the hypothetical
problem.
Suggest that one can drive-by even faster in adding {{fact}}? I think
this is the first step, the suggestion that identifying unsourced facts
is a way of achieving a similar end, and that we can all applaud it when
properly done.
Charles