If WR links were only deleted for not being reliable
sources, we wouldn't
be *having* this fuss. Most of the questionable deletions of WR and
links are under circumstances where reliable
sources are irrelevant--talk
pages, Wikipedia signpost, etc.
Why post a link to a site which engages in
harassment and outing, if
it's not even a reliable source? In what way is that not dickish?
different people have different interpretations of the phrase
"reliable source". It is not dickery to disagree on what constitutes a
reliable source; it is a content dispute. How the dispute is resolved, of
course, may result in dickery from one or both sides.