Yes, I agree. Where we would be in trouble on the no
orginal research is if one of us reported on our
personal experiences with masonic rituals.
Mark
--- Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
At 04:25 PM 12/7/2004 -0800, Mark Richards wrote:
You can document what other people have said
about
these things (moon hoax, reptilian humanoids, flat
earth etc) as long as it is in the context of
reporting what someone has claimed.
Mark
This exact same issue came up on Talk:Freemasonry
just a few weeks back,
discussing what to do when Masonic secrets wind up
on Wikipedia, and this
is the solution that I proposed there too. I expect
that someday when the
[[Masonic rituals and practices]] (or whatever)
article gets written it'll
be mostly "Author A says X in book N, and Author B
says Y in book M. Both
of them say P, but they differ on Q." The
credibility and credentials of
the various sources would have to be discussed too.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.