Yes, I agree. Where we would be in trouble on the no orginal research is if one of us reported on our personal experiences with masonic rituals. Mark
--- Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
At 04:25 PM 12/7/2004 -0800, Mark Richards wrote:
You can document what other people have said about these things (moon hoax, reptilian humanoids, flat earth etc) as long as it is in the context of reporting what someone has claimed. Mark
This exact same issue came up on Talk:Freemasonry just a few weeks back, discussing what to do when Masonic secrets wind up on Wikipedia, and this is the solution that I proposed there too. I expect that someday when the [[Masonic rituals and practices]] (or whatever) article gets written it'll be mostly "Author A says X in book N, and Author B says Y in book M. Both of them say P, but they differ on Q." The credibility and credentials of the various sources would have to be discussed too.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250