We have restricted the amount that can be presented. But what is really needed is better organized evidence. Most time and energy expended by Arbitrators goes into trying to figure out what is significant.
Fred
On Jul 12, 2005, at 6:51 AM, Dan Grey wrote:
Have the arbcom ever considered reducing the amount of evidence presented? I know there are already guidelines but 100 diffs seems a bit too many... surely any worthwhile case could be presented with a fraction of that number. Some of the essays seem a bit more than 500 words (is that the limit?) too.
Dan _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l