On 10/01/2008, Ned Scott <ned(a)nedscott.com> wrote:
I get the feeling some users were betting on this.
This should
definitely be removed. I would think the arbcom would have authority
in this matter, maybe someone should propose a case.
--Ned Scott
Arbcom have no authority over the devs. Which is perhaps fortunate.
Can you imagine having an arbcom case over the recent changes to the
way certain elements of template code worked?
--
geni