On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 10:48:58 -0700 (PDT), Ken Arromdee
<arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
> Ultimately, I think we should wait until we have
some external sources
> *for the importance of the case*. As it stands, it looks to me as if
> only Langan, the Mega Society pushers and a few Wikipedia editors
> actually give a damn about it. And that says "undue weight" to me.
Sure, it's undue weight.
Undue weight isn't original research, just like poor notability isn't original
research. Call it what it is.
Except that it *is* original research, because it's documented only in
primary sources.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG