Fred Bauder wrote:
The problem here is that we do not intervene. We
accept some case which have
gone through the dispute resolution process.
If there is to be intervention it will have to be by administrators (after a
policy allowing it is established).
Fred
>From: "Poor, Edmund W" <Edmund.W.Poor(a)abc.com>
>Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
>Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:34:45 -0500
>To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
>Subject: RE: [WikiEN-l] Re: Abusive editors
>
>User 1 should be asked to be polite after "some abuse", then requested
>to review "no personal attacks" after "Hostility".
>
>User 1 should be referred to arbcom for "Other abuse", and will make the
>committee's job easier if he offers "streams of abuse" just as
they're
>beginning to look into it all.
>
>No need to slap User 2 (either on wrist or back). Arbcom should
>intervene earlier and set User 1 straight, before he tempts his victims
>to take matters into their own hands.
>
>Uncle Ed
Agreed. ArbCom only deals with requests from other editors.
TBSDY