Given that admins are supposed to follow wikipedia policy (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ADMINABUSE#Administrator_conduct),
I'd suggest that it the admins who have failed to do this that are the
liability to the project. I am very concerned that many seem to get away
with flouting policy, and it seems very rare that admin access is taken away
from admins that do this.
I believe my edits speak for themselves as to why I am an asset to the
project, and also the fact that I follow Wikipedia's policies, as well as
contribute to a wide range of articles.
Regards,
Ed
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:31 AM, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:26 AM, R E
Broadley<rebroad+wikimedia.org(a)gmail.com> wrote:
My last 2 or 3 unblock requests have explained
that the procedures
mentioned in the guideline were not followed, so surely the block
should not stand, should it?
I really hope there's more to your request for unblocking than "the
procedures...were not followed". I would focus on explaining why
exactly you're an asset to the project, rather than a liability.
Nitpicking admins won't get you far (I hope).
Steve
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l