On 7/3/06, Lord Voldemort lordbishopvoldemort@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/2/06, Bogdan Giusca liste@dapyx.com wrote:
BG> Sunday, July 2, 2006, 5:17:50 PM, you wrote:
EM>> Good catch. Mislabeled as GFDL even. I've removed them from the FA + EM>> tagged them as unknown until a source for the GFDL claim is cited.
BG> hm... This image is marked GFDL-self, too:
BG> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Kuzma.jpg BG> from BG> http://www.lastovo.net/145a.jpg
also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Fumar.jpg from http://www.gianfrancogervasi.it/images/fumari_small.jpg
Just to be sure (I haven't taken a good look at the images), are we sure _we_ took it from _them_ and not the other way around? I would doubt it, but it's always a possibility. --LV
See the uploaders talk page. There are other things (image size, resulution lack of meta data) that also point in the direction of non original content. Wikipedians images tend to follow a certian style.