On 7/3/06, Lord Voldemort <lordbishopvoldemort(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/2/06, Bogdan Giusca <liste(a)dapyx.com>
wrote:
BG> Sunday, July 2, 2006, 5:17:50 PM, you
wrote:
EM>> Good catch. Mislabeled as GFDL even. I've removed them from the FA +
EM>> tagged them as unknown until a source for the GFDL claim is cited.
BG> hm... This image is marked GFDL-self, too:
BG>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Kuzma.jpg
BG> from
BG>
http://www.lastovo.net/145a.jpg
also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Fumar.jpg
from
http://www.gianfrancogervasi.it/images/fumari_small.jpg
Just to be sure (I haven't taken a good look at the images), are we
sure _we_ took it from _them_ and not the other way around? I would
doubt it, but it's always a possibility. --LV
See the uploaders talk page. There are other things (image size,
resulution lack of meta data) that also point in the direction of non
original content. Wikipedians images tend to follow a certian style.
--
geni