On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Snowspinner wrote:
I point out that the editor in question is subject to an arbcom case
right now regarding deletion and the railroading of "policy" to
"win"
debates. I think this incident would prove valuable evidence in that
case.
I admit I'm too busy trying to actually work on Wikipedia materials to
know anything about this case, but I feel confident in saying that whatever
cause Tony has been hauled before the ArbCom over is irrelevant to his
point here -- which is to argue that when in doubt, don't delete.
You've misread Phil's words. He is not referring to mem, and I
haven't been "hauled up before arcom".