on 4/11/07 6:12 PM, Phil Sandifer at Snowspinner(a)gmail.com wrote:
There are large aspects of Wikipedia ttat are dominated by people's
whose opinions should be discounted completely as the destructive
idiocy that they are.
These
opinions are generally offered in good faith, but they are not good
opinions. They are bad opinions. They should be extirpated from
Wikipedia's infrastructure.
And this must be taken and seen strictly as your opinion of their opinions -
nothing more.
And if you must be "discounting" something, make sure it is the person's
opinions you are "discounting" and not the person themself.
I have no use whatsoever for the opinions on adminship of someone who
believes Danny should not be an admin based on their disagreement
with WP:OFFICE as a policy. The project has no use for those
opinions.
To be truly called a "project", it must have room for all opinions - whether
you agree with them or not.
Marc Riddell