on 4/11/07 6:12 PM, Phil Sandifer at Snowspinner@gmail.com wrote:
There are large aspects of Wikipedia ttat are dominated by people's whose opinions should be discounted completely as the destructive idiocy that they are.
These opinions are generally offered in good faith, but they are not good opinions. They are bad opinions. They should be extirpated from Wikipedia's infrastructure.
And this must be taken and seen strictly as your opinion of their opinions - nothing more.
And if you must be "discounting" something, make sure it is the person's opinions you are "discounting" and not the person themself.
I have no use whatsoever for the opinions on adminship of someone who believes Danny should not be an admin based on their disagreement with WP:OFFICE as a policy. The project has no use for those opinions.
To be truly called a "project", it must have room for all opinions - whether you agree with them or not.
Marc Riddell