On 10/14/07, Avi <avi.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
A few thoughts:
...
3) Allowing admins to "rule" on user cases is fraught with danger, in
my opinion, in that favoritism/cabal accusations will be rife.
....
--Avi
--
en:User:Avraham
----
But if only 2 ArbCom members are currently drafting proposed
decisions, what is the harm in letting admins rule, since it appears
that ArbCom members aren't?
Wow, am I ever going to vote against everyone on ArbCom next time
around. Why do people run for it if they won't do the work?
KP