On 7/3/07, Slim Virgin <slimvirgin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/2/07, Slim Virgin <slimvirgin(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 7/2/07, Fred Bauder
<fredbaud(a)waterwiki.info> wrote:
You got it. BADSITES was nothing but provocation.
An attempt to overturn the policy it supposedly supported by generalizing.
It worked on the principle that the best way to get rid of a bad law
is to enforce it.
Except it wasn't a bad law when it was being done discreetly.
Except that what was actually being done wasn't BADSITES, or even
close. The removal (discreet or otherwise) of links to a handful of
particularly questionable sites is much smaller in scope than what
would have been covered by that proposal.
Kirill