On 7/3/07, Slim Virgin slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/2/07, Slim Virgin slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
On 7/2/07, Fred Bauder fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
You got it. BADSITES was nothing but provocation. An attempt to overturn the policy it supposedly supported by generalizing.
It worked on the principle that the best way to get rid of a bad law is to enforce it.
Except it wasn't a bad law when it was being done discreetly.
Except that what was actually being done wasn't BADSITES, or even close. The removal (discreet or otherwise) of links to a handful of particularly questionable sites is much smaller in scope than what would have been covered by that proposal.
Kirill