On 18 April 2012 13:53, Thomas Morton <morton.thomas(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
I'm not arguing Wikipedia is the solution. But the
argument that
printed encyclopaedias are better at this I know to be false.
More generally, arguments that make a comparison between an idealised
fantasy Britannica and a real-life WIkipedia are likely to be bad ones
and should be avoided.
- d.