From: "Rowan Collins" <rowan.collins(a)gmail.com>
I love the way Malone throws
everything right back the other way; a
nice demonstration of the use of 'spin', I feel. E.g. "approaching
400,000 pages" vs McHenry's back-handed "over 382,000 pages that
were thought "probably" to be encyclopedic articles".
His ending "crude analogy" was on the mark too. ;-)
"... Finally, as long as Mr. McHenry is going to end on a crude analogy, so
will I: using a traditional encyclopedia is like owning a nice, well-built
automobile that, unfortunately, has the seats and mirrors locked in place, the
radio frozen on one station, the throttle welded in one position -- and the car
is capable of only driving to a limited number of places predetermined by the
manufacturer. ... Frankly, I'd rather pee in a public toilet."
May the best man win, I guess - but lets hope we make
some
serious progress on validation soon, to give them an extra weapon
or two...
FWIW, I think those "mark article as 1.0 version" and similar proposals, would
go a long way there.
regards, sabre23t =^.^=
---
Outgoing mail scanned.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.797 / Virus Database: 541 - Release Date: 17.11.04