WJhonson wrote:
Okay I retract my claim that it was sourced.
Thank you.
However the article has no footnotes whatsoever, so that same claim, i.e. that nothing is sourced, could be made about every sentence in the article.
Sure. So any sentence in that article, if contested, could reasonably be deleted until a source was found.
I don't see have this side-issue advances the situation however. Which still remains, that we cannot verify that a particular editor is the BLP subject.
We have no need to verify that a particular editor is the BLP subject.