Okay I retract my claim that it was sourced.
However the article has no footnotes whatsoever, so
claim, i.e. that nothing is sourced, could be made about every
sentence in the article.
Sure. So any sentence in that article, if contested, could
reasonably be deleted until a source was found.
I don't see have this side-issue advances the
Which still remains, that we cannot verify that a particular editor
is the BLP subject.
We have no need to verify that a particular editor is the BLP subject.