Really, the problem with the BADSITES advocates
claiming "our position
is not BADSITES, it was written by a troll" is that they then follow
with actions indistinguishable from BADSITES, and which ignore
reductio ad absurdum.
These people seriously wish to trash NPOV and consensus (or even
"consensus") for ... what precisely?
- d.
Have you offered a solution? Are the only two positions on this issue
BADSITES or THICKSKIN? With the possible exceptions of a couple of
editors, no one enjoys debating this matter, and a resolution that
results in a consensus policy would be ideal. What elements do you think
would be included in a good policy on links to external harassment?
Will