On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:09 AM, stevertigo <stvrtg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Matthew Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Wikis are all about eventualistic processes.
It's kind of the point.
That said, automatic notification of people who care that a statement has
become stale is useful. Perhaps this could set a special flag in
watchlists?
I'm against the idea of automatically updating content for the reason that
it's assuming the prediction in the article about a future event is true and
actually happened as predicted.
That's an interesting compromise.
It's actually a refutation of your position (as were all the other
posts pointing out that automatic updating is a bad idea), but if you
want to call it a compromise, fair enough. :-)
Carcharoth