Sometimes it
happens, that other editors desire to include things
you don't agree with. In order to write a neutral encyclopaedia
it can be necessary to give even those POVs a fair share. As long
as you believe, that *you know* what neutrality means and don't have
to compromise, you are as likely as not working against neutrality.
You're not understanding what I said. I *want* there to be things in
Wikipedia that I don't personally agree with, so it's not a
compromise.
Your definition of compromise would make compromise impossible.
You *are* compromising, if you want there to be things,
you don't personally agree with.
--
Raphael