That's the patch I was referring to. Just because the developers
rejected it doesn't mean the end user has to. The software is GPL, after
all.
Joe Szilagyi wrote:
On 5/1/07, Blu Aardvark
<jeffrey.latham(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It's conceivable, but probably fairly
unlikely. Interwiki links, by
their nature, are incredibly unlikely to be spam (although there are a
lot of prefixes in the default table that are, in my opinion, utter
crap). Still, the patch is available if a user is genuinely concerned
about it.
Blu, which patch...? The developers rejected Bainer's proposed patch:
http://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8753