That's the patch I was referring to. Just because the developers rejected it doesn't mean the end user has to. The software is GPL, after all.
Joe Szilagyi wrote:
On 5/1/07, Blu Aardvark jeffrey.latham@gmail.com wrote:
It's conceivable, but probably fairly unlikely. Interwiki links, by their nature, are incredibly unlikely to be spam (although there are a lot of prefixes in the default table that are, in my opinion, utter crap). Still, the patch is available if a user is genuinely concerned about it.
Blu, which patch...? The developers rejected Bainer's proposed patch: