On Nov 27, 2007 12:19 PM, Alec Conroy <alecmconroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/27/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So now, in addition to the two aforementioned
lists, there's some
other set of people "colluding" privately off-wiki to take action
based on e-mails to the lists? O.K., let's assume for the moment that
this bizarrely bad-faith theory is true. What on earth does it have to
do with Wikipedia any more? Wikipedians privately e-mail each other
hundreds, perhaps thousands of times a day. What do you propose to do
about that?
For starters:
I propose that they show the community and/or the full arbcom all the
emails that led to the erroneous blocks, so we can see if the
endorsers behavior & judgment needs to be examined as well.
That seems pretty simple, yes?
Alec, as has been pointed out to you several times, both Matthew and
Guy have stated that Durova did not ask for permission to block
anyone. So, what e-mails could have possibly "led to the erroneous
blocks", and how could there possibly be any "endorsers"?