On 05/04/07, Matthew Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'd also say that if he wishes to erase this
scandal, he should pursue
it with the local paper that printed the story, and such papers as the
Village Voice that reprinted it. We are not the ones converting a
rumor to permanent record here.
I don't see any conceptual difference between us picking it up from a
paper and republishing it, to the Village Voice picking it up from a
paper and republishing it... does it somehow become more legitimate
three or four transactions down the chain?
- Andrew Gray