Michael Snow wrote:
What's really appalling is that in many instances,
not even the talk
page of the disputed article is being used. The only communication going
on is through edit summaries, and since those typically consist of "rv",
accusations of vandalism, snide remarks, or the pre-filled edit summary
from an admin using the rollback button, it's worse than useless.
I fully endorse this paragraph.
I'd rather see people fighting dirty on the talk pages than a revert
war. At least in a case like that, there is a glimmer of hope for
communication.
But of course, I would rather see people not fighting dirty at all,
but rather seeking to influence others through kindness, reason, and
patience.
--Jimbo