On 11/21/05, Phil Boswell <phil.boswell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
"geni" <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:f80608430511201957t789f8ce7y9c255459d19565a4@mail.gmail.com...
On 11/21/05, Philip Sandifer
<snowspinner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 20, 2005, at 10:45 PM, geni wrote:
Well going through the critiria for articles:
3.no reason to have a limit on that one(a link is a link)
I would say that 3
should have, if not 24 hours, at least some lag,
if only because people start articles in different ways.
They can recreate it. I
can't think of any reason to start an article
by just putting up a link and if they do it's hardly a hudge amount of
work that has been lost.
Would they then not run the risk of having their article tagged for Speedy
Deletion on the grounds of "recreating an article which was already
deleted"?
I don't think that is a speedy criteria.
Why should people have to jump through hoops simply to
avoid impolite people
tromping all over perfectly good articles-in-progress?
--
Phil
[[en:User:Phil Boswell]]
It is harldy jumping though a hoop to ask a person to at least create
a substub. If I can't tell something from spam I suggest we have a
problem.
--
geni