On 4/10/07, Phil Sandifer <Snowspinner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 8:27 PM, gjzilla(a)gmail.com wrote:
That is a great idea. We probably should not have the same for
admins, but
again _this makes sense_.
That's a terrible idea.
If we continually re-elected bureaucrats than the current idiocy that
dominates RFA would become entrenched on the bureaucrat level.
Big difference. Adminship is *no big deal*. Bureaucratship *is*, and we
honestly don't need *that* many of them (5 @ most, correct me if I'm wrong).
There aren't that many crats, and I think that fact calls for some oversight
(as opposed to admins, where you have 200 busloads of them to oversee the
others).