On 4/10/07, Phil Sandifer Snowspinner@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 8:27 PM, gjzilla@gmail.com wrote:
That is a great idea. We probably should not have the same for admins, but again _this makes sense_.
That's a terrible idea.
If we continually re-elected bureaucrats than the current idiocy that dominates RFA would become entrenched on the bureaucrat level.
Big difference. Adminship is *no big deal*. Bureaucratship *is*, and we honestly don't need *that* many of them (5 @ most, correct me if I'm wrong). There aren't that many crats, and I think that fact calls for some oversight (as opposed to admins, where you have 200 busloads of them to oversee the others).