Wikipedia Review will make me feel right at home? You mean they'll address this issue
which none of you Wikipedia administrators intend to, particularly David Gerard?
What's the fucking point of you guys being administrators when you won't address
important issues? Since when is it okay to speedy delete a new article re-created with the
intentions of addressing all of Wikipedia's notability demands? You guys are running a
reckless website and actually receive a deserved amount of negative press.
The article in question about journalist Alan Cabal:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox_The_unloved_artic…
Bill
________________________________
From: Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com>
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2009 4:23:02 PM
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Wikipedia Forum
Bill Carter wrote:
Can you get Wikipedia Review to take up issue with the
speedy deletion on March 30th, 2009 of the re-created Alan Cabal article, which was
followed by a demented deletion review a day later I believe? Here's the article in
question about journalist Alan Cabal:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox_The_unloved_artic…
It looks to me to be a fucking notable article with plenty of citations.
Mosey over there. They'll make you feel right at home.
Charles
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l