On 6/18/07, K P <kpbotany(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/18/07, elisabeth bauer
<eflebeth(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
2007/6/18, K P <kpbotany(a)gmail.com>om>:
I was attacked to get me to shut up. Certainly
it was a
well-orchestrated, well, maybe not that well since it wound up being
funny and ridiculous, but an attempt at a well-orchestrated gang up to
get me to shut up and stop editing because I had the nerve to call
someone on their bad conduct.
This happens all the time to editors on Wikipedia.
Could you please provide a link to your case so everybody can form his
own opinion about it?
greetings,
elian
It's on my talk page, links galore.
But what is your editing name????? Where is your Talk: page?????
The issues raised about Jay were concerning his
access to tools that
gave him information (and Slim Virgin it appears) that others do not
have access to.
Evidence?
Both Slim and Jay revealed this information in
RfAs,
Where has Slim done so?
Both revealed this information in RfAs,
Where has Slim done so?
If the policy is going to be enforced, don't
enforce it at politically
charged times only. Enforce it all of the time.
I do enforce it all the time. As I said, I block every open proxy I
come across. I've blocked dozens, perhaps hundreds. And *every* time
is politically charge on Wikipedia; frankly, especially now, when
people are letting bizarre conspiracy theories fly at the drop of the
hat, egged on by the banned trolls and WR, and other editors who make
all sorts of opaque and unsubstantiated claims, then refuse to explain
what they mean or back them up. And the latter refers to you, KP
Botany.
I do back up my claims. I send them in to the list all the time, just
for you, all my little AfD links, like the assertion that American
Polygraph Association should be deleted because it's not notable, like
Rock climbing for deletion.
There are no opaque and unsubstantiated claims coming from me on this
issue. I am asking questions, because I think the issue goes further
than just you defending your actions. I want to know what else is
subject to revelation by users with access to check user tools. I
want to know if my privacy will be invaded in a fly by, when someone
else is subject to check user and my account shows up. I wasn't
worried about check user when I was not ever subject to it--but CW was
not subject to check user and she should have been concerned about
what about her would have been revealed. The attached privacy policy
is misleading.
KP