On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:21 AM, WereSpielChequers
<werespielchequers(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
I'm hoping that we won't have too many
"trick" articles in this
process, or articles that should be deleted but not by CSD (the
criteria are "write an article that doesn't meet the deletion
criteria".
Hmm, as for my own experimental article (which I loaded with a few
newbie errors, but nothing too over the top), all that has happened
was an established user came along and deleted two of the sources, and
renamed a (deliberately misnamed) section heading.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Batu_Niah&action=history
I can't really fathom his thinking. Sure, they weren't high quality
sources, but they were the sources of the information nonetheless...
I think you needed to point out which bits of information corresponded
with which sources. I see the failed wikilinking for Bintulu was not
corrected. Oh, and was the spelling mistake intentional or
"interestig"? :-)
Carcharoth
PS. User:Speleo87 for writing an article about a town near famous
caves (speleology)? :-)