On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 1:21 AM, WereSpielChequers werespielchequers@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm hoping that we won't have too many "trick" articles in this process, or articles that should be deleted but not by CSD (the criteria are "write an article that doesn't meet the deletion criteria".
Hmm, as for my own experimental article (which I loaded with a few newbie errors, but nothing too over the top), all that has happened was an established user came along and deleted two of the sources, and renamed a (deliberately misnamed) section heading.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Batu_Niah&action=history
I can't really fathom his thinking. Sure, they weren't high quality sources, but they were the sources of the information nonetheless...
I think you needed to point out which bits of information corresponded with which sources. I see the failed wikilinking for Bintulu was not corrected. Oh, and was the spelling mistake intentional or "interestig"? :-)
Carcharoth
PS. User:Speleo87 for writing an article about a town near famous caves (speleology)? :-)