On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:36:28AM +0100, David Gerard wrote:
On 13/07/07, George Herbert
> It tells you what category it falls into. One can posit that for the
> album's article, that is necessary and sufficient rationale. We've
> hashed out the general policy there; it stands; the template's just a
> pointer to that.
Actually, no - WP:NONFREE, read unforgivingly, says
the actual album
cover art must be discussed.
I asked the same question about book covers on [[en:WT:NONFREE]] 
and the overwhelming response there was that use entirely for
"identification" is acceptable, and no discussion of the cover art
itself is required. I beleive there are currently efforts underway to
make a template with a generic fair use rationale for such articles.