Zero0000 conflates two distinct items: one is an illegal radio station Arutz-Sheva (aka A7, Arutz-7); the other is Israel National News (INN).
There is a long history of illegal radio stations in Israel, which includes Abie Natan and his Voice of Peace. Arutz-7 has been shutdown to the best of my knowledge. www.offshore-radio.de/israel/column01.htm or as provided by google: http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:zy_f9jEdt2gJ:www.offshore-radio.de/isra.... its the first hit of a google search on "abi natan voice of peace".
INN is a different entity. http://Israelnn.com. Its views are quite clear, with no attempt to hide them or present itself as being uninvolved.
Zero0000 has claimed repeatedly that its news contains fabricated/imaginary material, yet has declined to provide examples.
News is often quite different depending upon the source. Basic facts are at times misreported. Please look at coverage by the BBC, NYT, HaAretz, AFP and INN:
On July 23, a teenage Arab was killed by gunfire in Beit Hanoun, a built up area in the Northern section of the Gaza Strip. The incident was reported in multiple news sources, including [http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/23/international/middleeast/23CND-MIDE.html?h... (NYT)], [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3920181.stm (BBC)], [http://www.israelnn.com/news.php3?id=66197 (INN)], [[http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/455377.html (HaAretz)], [http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1515&e=2&u=/afp/... (AFP)].
the circumstances reported vary greatly regarding: the killers, their activities at the time, the age of the child, etc.
Lance6Wins.
--- Phil Sandifer sandifer@sbcglobal.net wrote:
True, but that's a different argument than the pirate radio station. I mean, the warrant for inclusion, in that case, is not that it is said by a pirate radio station, but that it is a belief of right-wing Israeli settlers. And thus the information should be introduced in those terms, instead of in terms of a pirate radio station.
-Snowspinner
On Sep 22, 2004, at 6:49 PM, Delirium wrote:
Phil Sandifer wrote:
I don't think the small but hardcore following
necessarily makes
their views encyclopedic - consider the case of
Lyndon LaRouche,
which the arbcom has ruled ought not be mentioned
in articles that do
not directly pertain to LaRouche. So I would
still lean towards this
not being encyclopedic.
In this case, I don't think it's directly
analogous. The views of the
right-wing Israeli settlers are pretty relevant to
the issue of
Israeli-Palestinian relations...
-Mark
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com