Zero0000 conflates two distinct items: one is an
illegal radio station Arutz-Sheva (aka A7, Arutz-7);
the other is Israel National News (INN).
There is a long history of illegal radio stations in
Israel, which includes Abie Natan and his Voice of
Peace. Arutz-7 has been shutdown to the best of my
knowledge.
www.offshore-radio.de/israel/column01.htm
or as provided by google:
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:zy_f9jEdt2gJ:www.offshore-radio.de/isr…l=en.
its the first hit of a google search on "abi natan
voice of peace".
INN is a different entity.
http://Israelnn.com. Its
views are quite clear, with no attempt to hide them or
present itself as being uninvolved.
Zero0000 has claimed repeatedly that its news contains
fabricated/imaginary material, yet has declined to
provide examples.
News is often quite different depending upon the
source. Basic facts are at times misreported. Please
look at coverage by the BBC, NYT, HaAretz, AFP and
INN:
On July 23, a teenage Arab was killed by gunfire in
Beit Hanoun, a built up area in the Northern section
of the Gaza Strip. The incident was reported in
multiple news sources, including
[
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/23/international/middleeast/23CND-MIDE.html?…
(NYT)],
[
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3920181.stm
(BBC)], [
http://www.israelnn.com/news.php3?id=66197
(INN)],
[[
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/455377.html
(HaAretz)],
[
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1515&e=2&u=/afp…
(AFP)].
the circumstances reported vary greatly regarding: the
killers, their activities at the time, the age of the
child, etc.
Lance6Wins.
--- Phil Sandifer <sandifer(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
True, but that's a different argument than the
pirate radio station. I
mean, the warrant for inclusion, in that case, is
not that it is said
by a pirate radio station, but that it is a belief
of right-wing
Israeli settlers. And thus the information should be
introduced in
those terms, instead of in terms of a pirate radio
station.
-Snowspinner
On Sep 22, 2004, at 6:49 PM, Delirium wrote:
Phil Sandifer wrote:
> I don't think the small but hardcore following
necessarily makes
> their views encyclopedic - consider the case
of
Lyndon LaRouche,
> which the arbcom has ruled ought not be
mentioned
in articles that do
> not directly pertain to LaRouche. So I would
still lean towards this
not being
encyclopedic.
In this case, I don't think it's directly
analogous. The views of the
right-wing Israeli settlers are pretty relevant
to
the issue of
Israeli-Palestinian relations...
-Mark
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com