On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:29:29 +0100
"David Gerard" <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The perennial proposals to run article forks seem to
me to embrace
pathological behaviour. Most articles really aren't problematic.
Sure, most articles aren't problematic. They're just unverifiable
nonsense vanity cruft ;)
But I *promise* you that you won't ever find a good solution for
shit like libanon-israel or circumcision or - you name it - without
making signed forks, where different (sets of) people can write
multiple coherent articles about the same thing, instead of
forcing everybody to mess with the same one.