On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 12:29:29 +0100 "David Gerard" dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
The perennial proposals to run article forks seem to me to embrace pathological behaviour. Most articles really aren't problematic.
Sure, most articles aren't problematic. They're just unverifiable nonsense vanity cruft ;)
But I *promise* you that you won't ever find a good solution for shit like libanon-israel or circumcision or - you name it - without making signed forks, where different (sets of) people can write multiple coherent articles about the same thing, instead of forcing everybody to mess with the same one.