2009/1/3 Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com>om>:
I think that is "could be", not "ought
to be". The mission is not to
maximise readership: as of early 2009, it still to "write the
encyclopedia". You know, the old Wikipedia some of us have thought we
are writing for a few years now.
As usual, there is the argument that if this other version of the
mission was interesting enough to enough editors, they could fork. Not
likely to happen, but it's a clarifying thought: really, how different
would it be?
Charles
You are free to model a reverse of most of user:TTN's last few
thousand edits to get some idea. In terms of complaints on forums and
blogs I see if you ignore the complaints more focused what people want
to write the loss of a significant chunk of our coverage of TV shows
and various popular media is the most complained about.
--
geni