Stubs aren't bad. They may be about a topic which doesn't have many
information.
--
Alvaro
On 14-01-2009, at 12:57, Ken Arromdee <arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 wjhonson(a)aol.com wrote:
I am sorry I still do not get it.
1) Is your proposal going to completely hide "unfinished" articles
from
the
public? If so who will be able to see them? Admins? Users?>>
To hide those articles which are unfinished, or which the community
has
decided are unfinished. So the AfD process becomes simply the
"Hide It
process" much less contentious.
You didn't answer the question about who gets to see them.
Given most possible answers to this question, it'll just end up
being the same
as AFD. After all, right now an admin can see a deleted article.
<<3) Isn't your proposal hiding all
stubs as well as some other
articles?
After all no stub by very definition is ready for "public
consumption".>>
No. It has nothing to do with stubs or non-stubs. Stubs are
published
today, and they would be published tomorrow. The only thing this
does
is provide a way for AfD to turn into something with less conflict.
Well, is it about hiding articles ready for public consumption, or
isn't it?
If it is, stubs get hidden. If it's not, you shouldn't say it is.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l