--- Alphax <alphasigmax(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I agree. AFAICT, the lists had already been trimmed
for things that we
already had articles.
I can see a valid argument that if all we did was trim each list, then the
resulting work may be considered derivative and thus not legal. More than that
should be done to be safe
ASIDE: The phone book analogy I previously stated may not apply since a phone
book is an unimaginative exhaustive list of names and numbers organized
alphabetically, while an encyclopedia's list of topics is a tiny sub-set of
human knowledge chosen for relevance. Thus the first has no copyright
protection, while I can see a strong argument that the second may.
I support temporary undeletion and merging of
these lists. All Encyclopedia lists if neccessary, even 1911EB (though
it should be noted next to these that a 1911EB article exists, since
these are PD already).
That sounds like a good plan to me. But much of the merger work should be done
off-line just to be on the safe side. Several people could each take a letter
in the alphabet from each list to work on off-line. Then people will work on
each resulting letter-list the same way they are now once it is put onto
Wikipedia.
There will be a bottleneck at the offline merger stage, but we can still do
this. It will just take a bit more work and a bit longer than the way we were
doing it (although merging the different lists may also reduce duplicated
effort).
-- mav
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com