On 12/4/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a positive or negative
sign, but it struck me
as an amusing experiment!
You loaded the article and found exactly the information you were
looking for, without having to dig six months into the edit history
(as I've needed to do, on certain occasions where a once-informative
article had been chopped and screwed beyond recognition). How could
yours be a negative sign?
—C.W.