sannse wrote:
Anthony DiPierro wrote:
On 5/19/06, sannse sannse@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
Anthony DiPierro wrote:
On 5/19/06, sannse sannse@tiscali.co.uk wrote: It's your idea, why don't you set it up?
No. The ball is firmly in your court. Put up or shut up.
--sannse
LOL, OK, you make up some hypothetical offer on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation, and it's my responsibility to contact them to find out that your offer was complete nonsense.
Why on earth do you think I made a offer on behalf of the Foundation? I don't have the authority to do that. I said that /I/ felt it was a good idea, and that I'm sure Danny would be able to arrange anything necessary... obviously that would be /if/ the Board agreed. I don't see any reason why they wouldn't - you'll have to ask and find out.
Sounds like you were baiting your trolling rod with a red herring.
I notice you haven't addressed the part of my post where I said that fair use *is* a right. Probably because you now realize that there have been Supreme Court cases which have explicitly stated that it is.
I won't argue particular points of law, because I am not a lawyer or an expert in law. Perhaps a position you should consider taking yourself.
Maybe his view of the law is not founded in idolatry.
I simply repeat what I've been told, and I chose carefully who I decide to take clarification from
ROTFL
Ec