"Protecting people" is really very broad isn't it?
How about "If the publication of certain information on a subject would
lead a reasonable person to believe that it poses a credible threat to the
subject's life."
Much narrower.
Will Johnson
In a message dated 7/1/2009 12:11:52 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
arromdee(a)rahul.net writes:
No, because in this context, "do what's right" means "you may ignore
rules
for
reasons other than the ones just listed". (It only lists improving and
maintaining the encyclopedia; protecting people is not listed.)
**************Make your summer sizzle with fast and easy recipes for the
grill. (
http://food.aol.com/grilling?ncid=emlcntusfood00000005)