Sean Barrett said:
Stan Shebs stated for the record:
Tony Sidaway wrote:
Geoff Burling said:
but is noteable because one
side is attaching workplace unsafe pictures to their contributions,
thus
disrupting the forum to prove their point.)
What does workplace unsafe actually mean in this context? Whose
workplace? Why unsafe? How can a person placing a photograph on a
website cause a completely unrelated workplace to become unsafe?
You know full well, it's been exhaustively explained multiple times.
It even has its own Wikipedia article.
Thank you.
I must say I find the idea that workplace rules should extend outside the
workplace in this way, applying to people who don't even work there, very,
very puzzling. If these rules are really so important, why do people
insist on risking breaching them by visiting internet sites that have
terms of use, like the following one applying to craiglist:
"You understand that craigslist does not control, and is not responsible
for Content made available through the Service, and that by using the
Service, you may be exposed to Content that is offensive, indecent,
inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise objectionable."