On 7/20/06, MacGyverMagic/Mgm <macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So what do you define as excessive fancruft? Surely a [[Bulbasaur]] article
isn't considered fancruft? I'm afraid that personal hate of the subject and
reputation paranoia are in fact the number 1 reasons for calling something
fancruft. Any valid reason to exclude or delete such items could be
explained with the regular policies without dumping the fancruft label on
it.
Any article on a fictional subject written largely as if the author
were living in the fictional universe in question is fancruft.
--
Mark
[[User:Carnildo]]