-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Michael Turley wrote:
There are a lot of current administrators that I've either voted to
support, or simply refused to vote oppose in their RfA that I
would never consider supporting in the position of an arbitrator.
If I'd thought that one future day they'd get handed the authority
to arbitrate in any way stronger than they now can (by blocking,
page locking, etc) it would certainly have been less "no big deal"
and a lot more "let's screen these people very carefully".
All right, then. How would you suggest we choose them?
- - Ryan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDRWcC6MKb8lYmCtcRAj+qAJwNIyHKpwtcXOd8bFIr3CvSERNl1QCgpucA
u9V2kIgrAWwpekdTszlV/m0=
=CMUM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----